My views and opinions on Mass Deportations by Trump.

I believe that mass deportation, as proposed and framed by Donald Trump, is fundamentally wrong. Don’t get me wrong… We have a lot of degenerates here in the USA who came from 3rd World countries that I would love to get rid of. Like Gang Members, druggies, Islamists who only want to expand Islam, etc.

However, while immigration enforcement is a legitimate function of government, sweeping policies that disregard human reality cause far more harm than good. The United States is not facing an abstract policy debate, it is dealing with real families, real workers, and real communities that are deeply woven into the fabric of this country. I’m an immigrant myself!

Many of the people targeted by mass deportation are not criminals. They are families who work, pay taxes, raise children, and contribute economically and socially to the United States. These individuals have built lives here over many years. Treating them as disposable undermines the very idea of fairness and due process. A nation that prides itself on opportunity should not punish people whose primary offense is trying to work hard and provide for their families.

Mass deportation on this scale creates a humanitarian crisis that resembles conditions typically associated with third-world countries. Forced removals, family separations, overcrowded detention facilities, and fear driven by constant enforcement create instability rather than security. These are the hallmarks of a police state run by a dictator, not the actions of a constitutional democracy. History shows that when governments rely on fear and mass punishment, the result is social breakdown, not order.

This approach is especially troubling because similar tactics have appeared before in some of history’s darkest chapters. In Nazi Germany, mass targeting of groups deemed undesirable began under the justification of national security and public order. While the contexts are different, the warning signs are the same. When a government normalizes collective punishment and dehumanization, it sets a dangerous precedent that erodes moral and legal boundaries.

The contradiction is even more stark given that the United States often describes itself as a Christian nation. Christianity emphasizes compassion, mercy, forgiveness, and care for the vulnerable. Policies that rip families apart and treat human beings as problems to be removed stand in direct opposition to those principles. If faith is to mean anything in public life, it must be reflected in how the most vulnerable are treated, not discarded.

A more rational and moral solution exists. The United States should provide a straightforward pathway to legal status or green cards for individuals who have demonstrated long-term employment, tax compliance, and good moral character. These are people who have already proven their commitment to this country. At the same time, immigration enforcement should be firm and targeted against those who genuinely endanger Americans, particularly individuals involved in violent crime, gang activity, and drug trafficking. Removing criminals protects communities. Removing hardworking families destroys them.

In the end, immigration policy should be guided by justice, proportionality, and humanity. Mass deportation fails on all three fronts. America can secure its borders without abandoning its values, and it must choose to do so if it wants to remain a nation defined by both strength and moral leadership.